What is NoLabels.org? According to their website, they are a cross-section of America who desire to "put our labels aside, and put the issues and what’s best for the nation first."
Based on their blog, the new group launched publicly in September, 2010.
The idea that people should "put labels aside" and judge ideas based purely on their merits is nothing new. The "NoLabels.Org" group may be a new version and may attract people who consider themselves reasonably minded, but the position they represent is part of an ages-old trend that ignores God's Word.
Why would I make such a statement? Based purely on their own words.
For example, they say that they "want to put labels aside, and put the issues and what's best for the nation first."
How do we know "what's best," and how do we compromise when we disagree? Why put aside labels that have served to clarify debate and identify positions?
First, let's talk for a moment about compromise.
How would the No Labels folks compromise with me on abortion?
I believe abortion is murder, others do not. Where can we find compromise? We could sit in a room for days on end and my position, based upon God's Word, will remain: abortion is murder. Those opposite me would claim it is not. If they are like most people who argue over abortion, they will argue based on emotional and economic grounds.
They may even say, "let's avoid labels and come to a compromise position." However, it seems to me that any compromise is actually an acknowledgement that abortion, for at least some reasons, is not murder. This isn't compromise, it is caving. For the person who believes that abortion is acceptable, nothing changes; abortion still takes place. For me, murder is taking place. How is this compromise?
Far worse, it ignores God's Word.
In general, one common problem with any group which seeks compromise as their end-goal is that the side in the right always has to allow the side in the wrong to gain ground.

'Did God really say you shall not eat from any tree in the garden?' Genesis 3:1
Secondly, No Labels, and groups like them, claim that the reasonable thing to do is to put aside labels. There are two critical problems with this view. First, when you put aside labels,you are then free to redefine or destroy the meaning of terms. Secondly, eliminating labels (black, white, hot, cold) destroys your ability to communicate. Labels exist for specific reasons, and clear communication is one of them.
How crafty it is to state that you do not want any labels! If you can get others to set them aside, you can define reality any way you like. When others object, simply say that they are the problem, that they are unwilling to let go of out-dated traditions.
Labels allow people to see clearly. When you eliminate them you blur meaning and create confusion. To quote Pilate: "What is truth?" Those who desire to eliminate labels must have a reason, and it occurs to me that honesty and truth are not part of their end goals.
How can we discuss right and wrong, or what is fair, if we cannot even use words that carry a clear meaning? How can you claim to want what's best for our nation if we can't agree on the meaning of labels such as "best" or even "nation"?
If those in the No Labels crowd really want what is best for our nation, I have a simple recommendation: Get down on bended knee and cry out to God for mercy. Put your faith and trust in Jesus Christ alone as savior. Read His Word for instruction. Then, do what He says.
You can find His Word in most bookstores under the label: BIBLE

Why would the Bible make a statement such as "blessed is the man who fears the LORD"? Why should anyone fear love? 
According to the Bible, none of this took millions of years and none of it formed haphazardly out of some mythical primordial soup. God created the earth and all that lives upon it in all of its amazing variety by speaking it into existence or, as in the case of man, forming Adam from the ground and breathing life into him.

As Christians we are told to be ready to give a defense for our faith and to preach the gospel routinely. If you strive to be faithful in these areas, you will eventually have this question fired at you as the questioner looks on with a hint of disgust because so many bad people get away with so much. The question may be mixed with an air of certainty that you cannot answer this timeless puzzle.
There are a couple keys to answering this question. First, understand that the person who asks this questions recognizes that evil exists. In this age of relativism, this is an important factor to recognize. Secondly, the person agrees that evil should be punished.

If you are not yet prepared to meet the God who created the universe by speaking it into existence, then today is the day to consider how you will be judged by Him.
Todd, for example, described how Adam is a 'type and shadow' of Christ. The term type and shadow refers to an Old Testament person , event, or thing that points to the coming Messiah or helps us understand the Messiah, whom we now know as Jesus the Christ. As an example, the book of Romans compares Christ to Adam. If you study Romans 5:12-16, you will get some appreciation for the comparison between the two. Adam, as the first human, represented all mankind; Jesus (God in fully human form) represented God the Father. Adam was tested in the garden and failed; Jesus was tested is the desert and was obedient. Sin entered the world through Adam, resulting in death; Christ took upon those sins on the cross and the free gift of grace entered the world through Him. In Adam, condemnation; in Christ, justification.
I had to dash into a local general store today. As I entered I saw that Pepsi has a new slogan on the side of their case boxes. They read, "Do Good" (see the photo, taken with my aging cell phone, at left).
Some would say this sense of right and wrong evolved over time, as part of the struggle for survival.
E.Z. focused his discussion on three key aspects of Christ's Incarnation: His Lordship, His Lowliness, and His Love. He used Philippians 2:1-11 as his springboard as we dove into the topic.
Kirk Cameron was the first speaker on day one. Kirk's story of growth from teen heartthrob to mature evangelist is best told 










